BOOKS
Writing Short Films- Linda J. Cowgill
I read the chapter ‘Plotting- the twists and turns’ in the book ‘Writing Short Films’
by Linda J. Cowgill to help me develop my script as I needed a deeper plot. I
found reading this book very helpful. The chapter starts off defining what a plot
is and the difference between a plot and a story. A plot is the cause and effects
of events in the story for example A causes B which in turn causes C, however
a story is more A, B and C or the events and not what causes the events.
In my film I didn't have much of a plot as I didn't have enough causes and effects.
To change this I made the plot link like this- the farmers mother died, which meant
the father gave up working on the farm and left it all to his son to do, he couldn’t
do it on his own, he ran out of money so he couldn’t pay for his license to
slaughter animals and could only afford the slaughter man to take one rarely so
that no one got suspicious of how he was slaughtering his animals without a
license. This in turn meant he needed someone to help that he didn’t have to
pay and someone who didn’t know enough about farming to realise he was
slaughtering without a licence. So he asked his cousin Leah, she found out
about the slaughtering’s, money issues and not having a licence as he left
paperwork out. She didn’t like how he treated the sapiens and how he killed
the new born sapien because her father left a few years prior and she hasn't
heard from him since, this devastated her and she could relate to the sapiens
getting taken away from their mothers or killed. One sapien was ill as the farmer
couldn’t afford medicine and was going to get it slaughtered. Her protective
sisterly instincts kicked in and she new she had to save the sapien, she goes
out in the night and sets the sapien free. The next day the farmer can’t find it
and the slaughter man turns up, it is found with its mother in the
barn. Leah has to make the decision to either let the sapien be taken away and
get killed or tell the slaughter man about the farmer’s illegal slaughters that
could put him in prison.
I found ading more causes and effects helped make the story flow better and made it more interesting for the audience. I also read about how the characters have to develop, Leah changes from being shy and closed up at the start to being passionate and standing up for herself and letting the emotions she has been holding back out. Johnny changes by being inconsiderate and selfish by treating the sapiens badly because he didn’t have the money, to realising he has been putting up a wall against his emotions since his mother died and he needs to stop letting the sapiens suffer due to his problems.
A useful point Linda Makes is everything in a short film has to have a point, in feature length films there might be action scenes that makes the film successful but in short films action scenes need a point, there isn’t enough time to have something unnecessary and you don’t want it to come across gratuitous.
At the start of a film anything is possible but once the audience understands the characters and the conflict this will fulfil the audiences expectations, not that they will predict the end but because the conclusion will feel more true to the audience.
Getting tips on how to structure my plot and how to make sure everything is connected and has a meaning really helped me add depth to my plot. Having a good plot will make it more interesting for the audience and hopefully make them question throughout the film what will happen next?
References
Linda J. Cowgill, 2005. Writing Short Films: Structure and Content for Screenwriters. Second Edition Edition. Lone Eagle.
OCR A2 Psychology Student Unit Health and Clinical Psychology- David Clarke
Janis and Feshbach- Fear Arousal
The underlying message in my film is about human behaviour and how we
treat other living things may it be animals or even other people. I want
people to realise what is happening in the world today and make a change.
I looked into some studies in psychology to see what I could do or not do
in my film to make the audience more active and change their behaviour.
A study by Janis and Feshbach in 1953 compared high-fear, medium-fear,
and low-fear presentations about dental hygiene, each presented to a group
of 50 high school students. The high-fear group saw a film that contained 71
different references to the topics of tooth decay, gum disease, discoloured
teeth, dental drills, and cancer. Many of these warnings were illustrated with
graphic photographs. The moderate-fear group saw a film discussing many
of the same topics, but containing only 49 anxiety-arousing references. The
low-fear group saw techniques of effective brushing and teeth cleaning,
without unpleasant topics. A fourth group, serving as a control, received no
presentation at all.
Students in the high-fear group were impressed with the film. 28% said they
found the film so disgusting that it really bothered them. However students
receiving the low-fear presentation thought it was boring, and only 2% in
that group found anything offensive in the presentation.
A week later Janis and Feshbach gave a questionnaire to the students asking
how tooth-brushing behaviour had actually changed. They found 28% of the
high-fear group reported that they had changed their habits, but 50% of the
low-fear group reported better habits. Evidently the low-fear group learned
from their presentation, even if they found it boring. Students in the high-fear
group had a quick emotional reaction but less behaviour change.
The reason to this might be because in the high-fear presentation the
instructions of how to improve dental hygiene may have been lost or forgotten
in amidst of the fear-arousing images.
After researching into this I decided instead of including lots of graphic imagery
within the film showing all the cruelty and abuse, I would be more suggestive and
show some hints to what being treated like a machine would be like. For example
in the barn scene instead of seeing the baby getting shot you would just hear the
gun shot. The reason I'm not going to show nothing at all is because I don't want
to bore people, however I don't want to shock the audience too much that they
don’t act and change their behaviour and ethics on what is acceptable and not.
I don’t want them afterwards to have a high emotion response but not change as
a consequence. I want my audience to feel inspired and positively change their
behaviour to help stop the camouflaged reality of slavery.
Fear appeals can be helpful in changing behaviours, but it is important that the
level of fear is tailored to each audience.


References
The Power of Fear | in Chapter 15: Social | from Psychology: An Introduction by Russ Dewey. 2015. The Power of Fear | in Chapter 15: Social | from Psychology: An Introduction by Russ Dewey. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.intropsych.com/ch15_social/power_of_fear.html. [Accessed 10 October 2015].
Janis, I and Feshbach, S. (1953) - Fear Arousal | Psych Yogi. 2015. Janis, I and Feshbach, S. (1953) - Fear Arousal | Psych Yogi. [ONLINE] Available at: http://psychyogi.org/janis-i-and-feshbach-s-1953-fear-arousal/. [Accessed 10 October 2015].
David Clarke, 2012. OCR A2 Psychology Student Unit Guide New Edition: Unit G543 Health and Clinical Psychology. Edition. Philip Allan.



Film/Genre- Rick Altman
Genre is different styles or families of texts, each genre has characteristic
features that are known to and recognised by audiences. Films including
my own can have multiple genres. Sapiens could be categorised into
being a thriller because there is a lot of suspense when Leah hears
screaming and when the baby is taken away and when she tries to set
the sapien free. It also has the mystery element, as it is uncomfortable
as the audience tries to work out what’s going on. Sapiens is also a
dark film with a serious theme making it similar to thriller and drama.
My film could also come under science fiction in the way it has an
alternate society/world where the characters live. But as science
fiction films generally include aliens or technology it would be more
soft science fiction as it's not detailed about the science involved but
deals more with cultural and social interactions, about how we
behave as humans and why we treat other living things in such
abusing ways. As my film seems to fit more into this type of genre it
shows the philosophical and psychological ethics of how we live.
This then lead me to research more into social science fiction as Sapiens
seemed to fit perfectly into this particular genre. Social science fiction
is concerned less with technology and space but more with sociological
speculation about human society. It speculates about human behaviour
and explores fictional societies allowing it to criticize the contemporary
world and to portray alternative societies and to examine the
implications of ethical principles.
The underlying message to my film is slavery. In todays society it’s not all
too different, we treat animals like slaves and even cage in other humans
that are different to us, especially in the camps for Syrian refugees. The
refugees are getting treated like animals and it isn’t much better than the
German concentration camps. So Sapiens is a very thought provoking
film with a social science fiction genre questioning human behaviour
and ethics.
Other social science fiction films are i,Robot, Planet of the Apes, In Time
and Minority Report. These films all show how selfish humans can be
using for example robots, apes or pre cogs to make life easier for us.
This links back to Sapiens as the sapiens get treated like machines
to produce milk for humans without even considering they are living and
have feelings.
The micro features of the films all echo the same style. The mise-en-scene
is all dark coloured including greys, blues and blacks. I feel this represents
the black and white truth of reality and how dark the world is. That’s why in
my film I’m going to have low lighting and the costumes are going to be
dull coloured.
Audiences know what to expect from genre but also they want some variation
to prevent dissatisfaction. So by having humans replaced with cows this
makes it more interesting and thought provoking making it more shocking
to the audience.
Rick Altman is a theorist on uses of genre and he created three types,
producer blueprint, marketing label and audience contract. Producer
blueprint is the conventional formula that producers follow in order to
create something new. Marketing label is the label attached to the film
by which the nature of the film is communicated through marketing to the
audience. Audience contract is that the genre predetermines the
expectations of an audience. They will judge a film on how far it meets those
expectations, but will also expect a surprise. I tried to use these in my film to
get a preferred reading from the audience. I used producer blueprint by taking
unethical practices in the world and turning them into something more
relatable for the audience. I will use marketing label by making sure I market
in a way that will intrigue people and get them to think differently about the world.
I used audience contract by using a similar colour scheme and style to my film
that fits social science fiction genre and also the twist on an alternate society
questioning human ethics.
My audience will use genre to give predictive pleasure and define their
expectations in advance of watching, which will be simultaneously
confirmed and confounded.
References
Rick Altman, 1999. Film/Genre. Edition. British Film Institute.
Genre | Define Genre at Dictionary.com. 2015. Genre | Define Genre at Dictionary.com. [ONLINE] Available at: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/genre. [Accessed 10 October 2015].
List of genres - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2015. List of genres - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [ONLINE] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genres. [Accessed 10 October 2015].
. 2015. . [ONLINE] Available at: http://blogs.grammar.sch.gg/a2media/files/2013/11/Altman-Handout-1s9r2m3.pdf. [Accessed 10 October 2015].









